Dog training is an integral part of responsible dog ownership, but how to pursue it is really the question. Should punishment, then, be considered fair game to get your pup to behave as one wants them to? This forms the basis for an ongoing debate between the only positive reinforcement and those who would use punishment when necessary. Let’s take a look at both sides of the argument.
Arguments on Purely Positive Reinforcement
Among others, Zak George has championed a training of dogs using only positive reinforcement methods. His argument is that punishment techniques can be harmful to your pooch’s health and wellbeing. In fact, he claims that research confirms this claim. According to him, using rewards such as treats or praise instead of punishments will make your pup more likely to respond positively and build trust with you faster than punishing them would.
The Case Against Only Positive Reinforcement
On the other hand, some claim that, from the available research, we cannot say with surety that punishment is harmful. They refer to various studies that have shown no lasting harm resulting from punishment when used in conjunction with positive reinforcement. They also indicate that, whatever the training method, one should never use physical force to discipline one’s dog-that includes hitting or yelling at them. The goal is always to help your pup understand what they did wrong without causing any long-term damage or trauma to them.
Conclusion:
Both points seem to make quite a lot of sense from either side on punishment as means for dog training. If this is still a point of confusion to you and wondering which path to choose with this for you and your pup, consulting a qualified dog trainer will likely help guide in the right direction for what may be best you and your pup. Whichever route you choose, remember it’s patience and consistency that works in successful dog training-and, of course, lots of treats!
